Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

äÉμï½Ð®Ì«àîç¯Ûö¿¡ ëîÇÑ Î¨ÔéêÈÀÇ ÝÂà° æÚϼ

RADIOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF THE TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT BY THE STANDARDIZED PROJECTION TECHINIQUE

Ä¡°ú¹æ»ç¼± 1983³â 13±Ç 1È£ p.7 ~ 15
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÃÖÇѾ÷(õËùÕåö)/Han Up Choe

Abstract

ÎÇùêßÒ÷¾°¡ ÝïÎòîÜïáßÈÀÌ°í äÉμソ¡ ñøßÒÀÌ ¾ø´Â à÷ìÑ 45Ù£°ú äÉμï½Ý»ÀÇ Íéï¹, èâß¿, ðþ
åËÔõ¿¡ ëîÇÑ û¡÷¾×äßÈÀÌ ¾øÀ¸¸é¼­ ÔÙ÷Ô, ÝÕöáÊï, ËÒÏ¢î¡äô ¹× μï½íÚëåµî äÉμï½ÀÇ ×äßÈÀ»
û¼áÍÇÏ´Â 96Ù£À» øÍÏ¢ãÁ ¹× 2.54§¯ ËÒÏ¢ãÁ ñ§éÓö° äÉÎ¼ï½ ÞØö°Û°êÈ XàÊЮ̫ÞÐòØÀ» õÉç¯ÇÏ¿©
μï½ÊàÌ° ¹× ΨÔéÀÇ ì¹ÔÑ Ëå×îÔõÀ» ͪö´ ÝÂà°ÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº Ì¿ÒÕÀ» ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. øÍÏ¢ãÁ ΨÔéð¢ïÇÀÌ Î¼ï½ õÌä¢ïÇ ý­Û°¿¡ êÈöÇÇÏ´Â ÌÑéç°¡ ïáßÈìÑÀº ñ§éÓö° øÁг 8.9%
¿´°í ü´íº´Â 26.6%¿´´Ù.
2. ËÒÏ¿ãÁ ΨÔéð¢ïÇÀÇ Î¼ï½×ÌÑÿ¡ ÓßÇÑ êÈöÇμÌõ´Â ßÈìÑÀº ý­Û°êÈöÇ°¡ 2.2%ÀÌ°í ü´íº´Â
39.6%¿´´Ù.
3. 2.54§¯ ËÒÏ¢ãÁ ΨÔéÀÇ îñÛ°ì¹ÔÑ Ëå×î´Â ïáßÈìÑ¿¡¼­ ñ§éÓö° øÁг 13.49§®¿´°í ü´íº´Â
10.68§® ¿´´Ù.
4. ΨÔéð¢ïÇÀÇ ãùð·ì¹ÔÑËå×î´Â ïáßÈìÑÀº ñ§éÓö° øÁг 13.96§®¿´°í, ü´íº´Â 10.27§®¿´´Ù.
5. ñ§éÓö° ΨÔéÊàÀÇ êÈöÇó¬´Â ü´íº°¡ ïáßÈìÑ¿¡ ÝïÇÏ¿© ¾à°£ Å« °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
The purpose of this study was to investigate the radiographic images of the condylar
head in clinically normal subjects and the TMJ patients using standardized projection
technique. 45 subjects who have not clinical evidence of TMJ problems and 96 patients
who have the clinical evidence of TMJ problems were evaluated, but the patients who
had fracture, trauma and tumor on TMJ area were discluded in this study.
For the evaluation of radiographic images, the author has observed the condylar head
positions in closed mouth and 2.54§¯ open mouth position taken by the standardized
trans cranial oblique lateral projection technique.
The results were as follows:
1. In closed mouth position, the crest of condylar head took relatively posterior
position to the deepest point of the glenoid fossa in 8.9% of the normals and in 26.6%
of TMJ patients.
2. In 2.54§¯ open mouth position, condylar head took relatively posterior position to the
articular eminence in 2.2% of TMJ patients and 39.6% of the normals.
3. In open mouth position, the horizontal distance from the deepest point of the
glenoid fossa to the condylar head was 13.96§® in the normals and 10.68§® in TMJ
patients.
4. The distance of true movement of condyalr head was 13.49§® in the normals and
10.27§® in TMJ patients.
5. The deviation of mandible in TMJ patients was slightly greater than that of the
normals.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸